<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ohm Force announces split payments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.protoolerblog.com/2009/05/20/ohm-force-announces-split-payments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.protoolerblog.com/2009/05/20/ohm-force-announces-split-payments/</link>
	<description>Pro Tools and pro audio blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:53:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MC</title>
		<link>http://www.protoolerblog.com/2009/05/20/ohm-force-announces-split-payments/comment-page-1/#comment-6359</link>
		<dc:creator>MC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protoolerblog.com/?p=3108#comment-6359</guid>
		<description>When you think about it, software companies are the one industry that can offer payment plans without needing to do credit checks - since most software has time-based &quot;free demo&quot; features that expire, it should be easy to write in a monthly &quot;failure&quot; that requires a quick login to update your payment. 

I could see people buying even pricey software this way, via monthly payment - it would feel like &quot;leasing&quot; to most consumers. The potential for abuse would be consumers purchasing for &quot;one big project&quot;, making two payments and being done in 60 days - but really, what&#039;s wrong with that? It would be similar to renting, would expose people to the software, and the manufacturer would at least get *some* money as opposed to pirating (which consumers are more likely to do if they just need software for a short period). (&quot;Yo, charley, can I borrow your InDesign disc for this one brochure??&quot; ) When people use your product, they&#039;re more likely to purchase it (if it&#039;s a good product).  I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you think about it, software companies are the one industry that can offer payment plans without needing to do credit checks &#8211; since most software has time-based &#8220;free demo&#8221; features that expire, it should be easy to write in a monthly &#8220;failure&#8221; that requires a quick login to update your payment. </p>
<p>I could see people buying even pricey software this way, via monthly payment &#8211; it would feel like &#8220;leasing&#8221; to most consumers. The potential for abuse would be consumers purchasing for &#8220;one big project&#8221;, making two payments and being done in 60 days &#8211; but really, what&#8217;s wrong with that? It would be similar to renting, would expose people to the software, and the manufacturer would at least get *some* money as opposed to pirating (which consumers are more likely to do if they just need software for a short period). (&#8221;Yo, charley, can I borrow your InDesign disc for this one brochure??&#8221; ) When people use your product, they&#8217;re more likely to purchase it (if it&#8217;s a good product).  I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
