Comments on: Pro Tools 8 – the more unsung features http://www.protoolerblog.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-the-more-unsung-features/ Pro Tools and pro audio Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:47:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: terminal3 http://www.protoolerblog.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-the-more-unsung-features/comment-page-1/#comment-4782 terminal3 Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:02:31 +0000 http://www.protoolerblog.com/?p=1474#comment-4782 I have to do a lot of stuff with iZotope RX which as you probably know benefits from offline processing, and thus by association would benefit from audiosuite handles! bad location dialogue is the bane of my existence sometimes. ;) I have to do a lot of stuff with iZotope RX which as you probably know benefits from offline processing, and thus by association would benefit from audiosuite handles! bad location dialogue is the bane of my existence sometimes. ;)

]]> By: stiff http://www.protoolerblog.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-the-more-unsung-features/comment-page-1/#comment-4774 stiff Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:47:51 +0000 http://www.protoolerblog.com/?p=1474#comment-4774 terminal3: Oh, OK. Completely misunderstood you then. Not that I think I would use it very much (I don't do post), but sign me up on the list of people who would like to see it :) terminal3: Oh, OK. Completely misunderstood you then. Not that I think I would use it very much (I don’t do post), but sign me up on the list of people who would like to see it :)

]]> By: ALX002 http://www.protoolerblog.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-the-more-unsung-features/comment-page-1/#comment-4758 ALX002 Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:18:42 +0000 http://www.protoolerblog.com/?p=1474#comment-4758 Will PT8 have a good MIDI BEAT CLOCK Now???? I wonder why PRO USERS never mentionned this!!! I'm working since PT V4 for TV, CINEMA and MUSIC......... and I really hope they have corrected their MIDI beat clock..... If you want any more precise informations about that problem, contact me : alx002 ( at ) ya h oo . fr Will PT8 have a good MIDI BEAT CLOCK Now???? I wonder why PRO USERS never mentionned this!!! I’m working since PT V4 for TV, CINEMA and MUSIC……… and I really hope they have corrected their MIDI beat clock….. If you want any more precise informations about that problem, contact me : alx002 ( at ) ya h oo . fr

]]> By: terminal3 http://www.protoolerblog.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-the-more-unsung-features/comment-page-1/#comment-4756 terminal3 Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:54:34 +0000 http://www.protoolerblog.com/?p=1474#comment-4756 stiff: I'm wanting audiosuite handles - where audiosuite processing will actually do a bit before the front and a bit after the end of the region (ideally user-definable) - that way when you process a region with audiosuite you can do crossfades into the next region if necessary AFTER you've processed it, instead of having to think ahead and or duplicate and then "stretch" the region. it would be a lifesaver when I'm doing post, and it would save me a lot of time. scott church has acknowledged to me that it would be a very useful feature indeed but I've yet to receive any confirmation as to whether or not it's been implemented in PT8. stiff: I’m wanting audiosuite handles – where audiosuite processing will actually do a bit before the front and a bit after the end of the region (ideally user-definable) – that way when you process a region with audiosuite you can do crossfades into the next region if necessary AFTER you’ve processed it, instead of having to think ahead and or duplicate and then “stretch” the region. it would be a lifesaver when I’m doing post, and it would save me a lot of time. scott church has acknowledged to me that it would be a very useful feature indeed but I’ve yet to receive any confirmation as to whether or not it’s been implemented in PT8.

]]> By: stiff http://www.protoolerblog.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-the-more-unsung-features/comment-page-1/#comment-4754 stiff Sat, 04 Oct 2008 06:58:06 +0000 http://www.protoolerblog.com/?p=1474#comment-4754 terminal3: are you sure? I could've sworn he talked a little about improved audiosuite like faster previewing and such. Did you have anything specific in mind? Greg: :) You're of course right! I must have been tired when I wrote that. I actually use it from time to time! There have been improvements to it. I'll correct that mistake so I don't spread anyore misinformation. Thanks for the note :) terminal3: are you sure? I could’ve sworn he talked a little about improved audiosuite like faster previewing and such. Did you have anything specific in mind?

Greg: :)
You’re of course right! I must have been tired when I wrote that. I actually use it from time to time! There have been improvements to it. I’ll correct that mistake so I don’t spread anyore misinformation. Thanks for the note :)

]]> By: Greg L http://www.protoolerblog.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-the-more-unsung-features/comment-page-1/#comment-4753 Greg L Sat, 04 Oct 2008 03:06:58 +0000 http://www.protoolerblog.com/?p=1474#comment-4753 Locking regions? Hasn't this been a feature in almost every version of Protools. I know it's in Version 7, and 6 and most likely 5. Command-L... always worked. I am most excited about the added insert count. I've been complaining about this since PT5. When they added double the sends, I was like "what? Who really needs that many sends." :) all in perspective I guess. It's always been annoying to have to add an aux track if you wanted more than 5 inserts on a track, mainly during a mix of course. Locking regions? Hasn’t this been a feature in almost every version of Protools. I know it’s in Version 7, and 6 and most likely 5. Command-L… always worked.

I am most excited about the added insert count. I’ve been complaining about this since PT5. When they added double the sends, I was like “what? Who really needs that many sends.” :) all in perspective I guess.

It’s always been annoying to have to add an aux track if you wanted more than 5 inserts on a track, mainly during a mix of course.

]]> By: terminal3 http://www.protoolerblog.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-the-more-unsung-features/comment-page-1/#comment-4747 terminal3 Fri, 03 Oct 2008 23:51:03 +0000 http://www.protoolerblog.com/?p=1474#comment-4747 sadly, no mention of AS handles - doesn't mean they're not there though, I suppose I'll have to wait and find out. thanks for the ongoing updates here! sadly, no mention of AS handles – doesn’t mean they’re not there though, I suppose I’ll have to wait and find out. thanks for the ongoing updates here!

]]> By: stiff http://www.protoolerblog.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-the-more-unsung-features/comment-page-1/#comment-4743 stiff Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:12:21 +0000 http://www.protoolerblog.com/?p=1474#comment-4743 terminal3: I think Scott talks a little about audiosuite updates in the video I just posted. That's all I've heard. alex: Now that you mention it I haven't seen anything about busses. So I guess it's still the same... Anyone else heard anything? terminal3: I think Scott talks a little about audiosuite updates in the video I just posted. That’s all I’ve heard.

alex: Now that you mention it I haven’t seen anything about busses. So I guess it’s still the same… Anyone else heard anything?

]]> By: alex.s http://www.protoolerblog.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-the-more-unsung-features/comment-page-1/#comment-4742 alex.s Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:03:52 +0000 http://www.protoolerblog.com/?p=1474#comment-4742 Does anyone know how many busses there are now (still 32 ?) Does anyone know how many busses there are now (still 32 ?)

]]> By: terminal3 http://www.protoolerblog.com/2008/10/03/pro-tools-8-the-more-unsung-features/comment-page-1/#comment-4741 terminal3 Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:51:43 +0000 http://www.protoolerblog.com/?p=1474#comment-4741 Any word on audiosuite handles? Any word on audiosuite handles?

]]>